INDIGENT CARE COLLABORATION
Austin,
TX
April
2000
§ Background
Over the years, healthcare
providers and related human service agencies in the region have participated in
cooperative efforts to improve the delivery of services to low income and
uninsured populations. Recently, governmental and political entities have
shown a willingness to consider groundbreaking approaches to financing and
delivery of care.
Despite many efforts,
considerable access and financing issues continue to exist and create obstacles
for low-income uninsured residents of Central Texas. Faced with these
issues, healthcare safety net providers in Travis County came together in the Spring
of 1997 to form the Indigent Care Collaboration (ICC). The intent of the
ICC is to develop joint projects among members to increase access, improve
quality and lower the costs of providing care to the region's un-funded
population. Fundamental to the ICC approach is the inclusion of behavioral
health as the core service and an understanding that a growing need for
behavioral health services is at the base of a substantial proportion of primary
care and other visits to healthcare providers. Similarly, dental health
providers have been an integral part of the ICC since its inception. As a
result of the "holistic" approach, we begun initially as an informal
forum quickly evolved into a platform to create a more coordinated and
integrated system of services for this vulnerable population.
As the ICC began to
develop programs, it became necessary to create a more formal structure in which
to implement and monitor its efforts. As a result the ICC was organized as
a Texas Uniform Unincorporated Non-profit Association (TUUNA). members
include health and social services providers, payers and purchasers throughout
Travis County, including hospitals, healthcare networks, clinics, government
agencies, non-profit organizations, individual providers and others.
Care is currently
delivered to the uninsured through the following providers, most of whom are
charger members of the ICC. They are:
-
Austin/Travis County
Health and Human Services Department
-
Community Health
Centers (FQHC 11 sites)
-
David Powell Clinics
-
School Based/School
Linked Services
-
Thurmond Heights
-
Austin/Travis County
Mental Health Mental Retardation Center
-
Blackstock Health
Center
-
El Buen Smaritano
Clinic
-
Hays County Health
Department
-
People's Community
Clinic
In addition, healthcare
for the indigent is legislatively mandated through the County Indigent Health
Care Act. The act requires counties, public hospitals, and hospital
districts to provide a certain level of healthcare to their constituents.
The City of Austin and Travis County have chosen to fulfill this mandate through
the Medical Assistance Program (MAP). Although the State only mandates
assistance for those 17% above poverty, the City of Austin and Travis County
have opted to provide care to individuals a the 100% above poverty, which is
much greater than what is legislatively required. The MAP Program for the
City and the MAP Program for the County are jointly administered by City and
County staff within the Austin/Travis County Health and Human Services
Department.
The Clinical Assistance
Program (CAP), is a City Program. This program is specific to the
homeless, unemancipated minors, and undocumented individuals residing in the
City of Austin. CAP provides access to the same level of healthcare
services to MAP. However, these individuals only qualify for services up
to the level of poverty specified under the County Indigent Care Act
(22%). The average enrollment in the City MAP Program for the fiscal year
1999 was 8,158 and the County MAP Program it was 2,011. Williamson and
Hays Counties provide services up to the level of poverty specified in the
County Indigent Health Care Act.
The ICC has expanded out
to relevant organizations in the surrounding counties to broaden its base and
regionalize the project. Residents of Hays and Williamson Counties, for
example, have long relied on Travis County safety net providers and
programs. It is important therefore that leaders in these counties work
with the ICC to develop appropriate system-wide solutions to the issues faced by
the uninsured. The ICC has developed several specific ventures, but has
not yet formally examined an approach that focuses on care management principles
to finance and deliver services to the un-funded population. The
collaborative efforts that have already been established, such as leveraging the
ability to the unified call system to establish and tract patients through a
medical home.
Several possibilities have
been considered for this system redesign, including expansion of MAP, expansion
of the ICC call-system and the creation of an indigent care financing
district. One of the major obstacles to developing such a care management
system, however, is the lack of objective analysis on how un-funded patients
would best be served by such a system and how it could expand into a restructure
financing system.
→Back
to Top
§ Guiding
Principles
The clear goal of the
program is to design a delivery and financial system for the uninsured in
Central Texas. Although, we do not know what form it will take, we do know
what qualities we would like our ultimate solution to have:
We want to find the best
answers for the community recognizing that this will almost certainly require
some compromises by each partner in all three counties.
→Back to Top
§ Initial
Project Objectives
During Phase I
of this project will utilize this support provided by
Medimetrix, and this grant to further examine issues surrounding care
to the region's uninsured population. Our focus will be on
access, availability, financing and the influence of cultural and
political factors distinctive to our own region. Through this
grant process the ICC will develop appropriate clinical and
administrative integrators to support the creation of an adequately
financed and organized system.
-
Expand
ICC participation to include additional representation in Travis
County and the surrounding region, including Hays and Williamson
Counties
-
Assess
the size and scope of the uninsured problem and determine the
adequacy of the existing system in meeting the needs of this
population
-
Develop
alternative approaches for delivering and financing care to the
uninsured
-
Analyze
the alternatives and create an appropriate model for the ICC
service area
-
Work
with state and local policy makers and legislators to support
changes and ensure buy-in
-
Develop
indicators for evaluation of this program
→Back to Top
§
Financing
& Outreach Strategy
The work plan
developed includes structure of one Executive Committee, a Steering
Committee and three working committees that include Finance, Research
and Development and Public Policy. (See attached Model).
The Committees will be used to enhance the creativity of design,
review of vision, assessment and selection of models and assist in
development of finance and delivery structure. The Steering
Committee is made up of carefully selected community leaders
repreenting all stakeholders from all thre counties including; county
judges, mayors, physicians, consumers, major employers, small
businesses, behavioral health, dental and local foundations. The
role of the Steering Committee is to enhance actions to fit the
vision, use influenece to shape public opinion, review and recommend
delivery and financing models, provide public information and
coordinate outreach. This committee has agreed to meet every
other months and has a prominent and well-respected physician and CEO
of a mjor company as the co-chairs. Our vision for developing
both the delivery and financing models encompasses active
communication several times throughout each phase of the
process. This will ensure that stakeholders will be part of each
state of our design so that the outcome at the end of the process
ensures support and buy-in form each group. Additional ad hoc
stakeholder committees will be formed as part of the Public Policy
Committee. This is anticipated primarily when we reach the model
design the "how to finance" states of the selected model and
the political advocacy issues required to support implementation of
the desired model. Key
components of the work plan include vision, research,
education/outreach, assessment, and development of models,
implementation and reporting. Time lines have been assigned and
a strategy has been developed within the time line allowing for
constant input and feedback to and from the stakeholder committees. Within
the education/outreach tasks we intend to have numerous stakeholder
groups and focus group initiatives to enhance not only feedback and
participation in the model but also education as to the issues
surrounding the reasons for the need to redesign a delivery model. Outcome
measures will be based on producing the ideal model for this community
and financing structure that can be supported by the stakeholders
involved in this process. Legislative issues and other broader
policy questions will have been identified and selected, as
appropriate for possible action during a future legislative
session. A shared vision that is bottom-up focused will continue
to drive this initiative and will shape the model selected.
Final outcome to have the model fully developed and supported in time
to apply for Phase II.
→Back to Top
§
Challenges
-
Aggressive
time line
-
Proper
education and buy-in
-
Ideal
model design that is affordable and complete enough to satisfy
stakeholders
-
Political
support in three counties with distinct approaches to solutions of
community problems.
In
addition, there is an educational challenge involved in bringing
healthcare issues to the forefront in three counties that do not
perceive healthcare issues as a problem.
The
way we plan to overcome these hurdles is through an aggressive work
plan and a handpicked group of community leaders that bring the
passion and talent necessary for the critical thinking needed to reach
the desired outcomes.
There
is a tremendous commitment from the lead partners to overcoming the
barriers because the combination of growth and growing gaps between
the "haves" and have "nots" will undermine the
healthcare system so dramatically we will not be able to sustain the
safety net without a total redesign.
→Back to Top
§
Demographics
Central Texas,
with its rich ethnic mix and cultural diversity, is among the most
rapidly growing area of the United States. In less than ten
years, the population of Travis County, which includes the capitol
city of Austin has increased almost 25% to about 712,000
residents. This rapid growth is fueled by a diversified economy
led by the high technology sector. However, economic disparities
between high-income technology workers and low-income workers with
limited skills place increased strains on the lcoal healthcare and
social services system.
Travis County is
located in the South Central part of Texas. Measured from
Austin, the largest metropolitan area in the region. Dallas is
190 miles northeast, Houston 165 miles southeast and San Antonio 80
miles to the southwest; the Mexican border is 225 miles away.
Austin is the commercial heart of Central Texas, located in a major
agricultural area of ranching, poultry, dairy, cotton and grain
production. It is home to the main campus of the University and
State Government, Dell Computers, Motorola and IBM are major
employers.
Tri-County
comprises the initial service area of the project but we are already
expanding the participation of this project to include Hays County to
the south and Williamson County to the North. The additional
population of these two counties adds another 330,000 to the 712,000
figure. The region's population is increasing at a higher rate
than the State of Texas or the nation as a whole. The ethnic
composition of the area is diverse and Hispanics represent the most
rapidly growing proportion of residents. Hispanics currently
make up about 27% of the population up from 15% in 1970 and 21% in
1990. About 11.5% of the population is African-American and the
rest is Anglo and other racial ethnic groups.
Over the past
two decades, there have been a decrease in the number of
"traditional" family households in Travis County and an increase
in the number and proportion of households led by single
females. Today, single females head 17% of family households
compared with 10% in 1970. Children under the age of 18 live in
more than six in ten of these households. This trend is
significant because households headed by single females particularly
those with children, are associate with adverse economic and social
characteristics, such as high poverty rates and reliance on public
assistance.
In total over a
quarter of Travis County population or more than 190,000 people, are
considered "low-income," living below 200% of the federal
poverty level. Of these, more than half (15.4%) of the
population or close to 110,000 residents) live below 100% of the
poverty level. These rates are highest among minority groups,
the poverty rate for Hispanics and African-American (26%) is about
two-and-a-half times that of the Anglo population (10%). Other
measures of community need show that each month, close to 50,000
Travis County residents receive food stamps, more than 7,000 receive
emergency rent assistance, and more than 8,000 receive assistance in
paying utilities.
A portion of the
population living in poverty receives healthcare benefits through the
Medicaid program. The Texas Health and Human Services Commission
reports that more than 40,000 Travis County residents were enrolled in
Medicaid in November 1998. Medicaid covers relatively few adults
in Texas. Currently TANF is limited to individuals with incomes
at or below 17% of the federal poverty level. The number
enrolled in Medicaid is declining in Travis County. The
proportion of residents insured by Medicaid in the adjoining counties
is much smaller.
Because health
insurance is associated with life circumstances such as employment,
retirement, or participation in government programs, individual health
insurance status changes over time. As a result, it is difficult
to pinpoint precise numbers of uninsured residents at any one
time. Nevertheless, attempts have been made to qualify the
Travis County uninsured population in order to better develop policy
and programs.
Health
Partnership 2000, a collaborative of Austin area healthcare providers,
conducts periodic community telephone surveys that include questions
about health insurance status. In the most recent survey in
1997, 14% of Travis County respondents reported that not all adult
members of their household had health insurance. Since the 1997
Health Partnership 2000 survey, more than 14,000 small businesses in
Texas have dropped employee health insurance coverage.
Representative
of Austin/Travis County Health and Human Services Department believe
that as much as 25% of the population, three-quarters of which are
adults, are now uninsured. The SETON Healthcare Network
estimates that about 151,000 people or more than 21% of the Travis
County population are uninsured. St. David's Healthcare
Partnership estimates that 18% of the employed Travis County workforce
or about 100,000 workers are uninsured. This figure rises to
150,000 to 170,000 when workers and their dependents are included.
Using all
figures it is estimated that between 100,000 and 135,000 adults in
Travis County, representing about 15-20% of the population, are
currently uninsured. These individuals are the target population
of this project. Most of these Travis County residents are
considered low-income, living at or below 200% of the federal poverty
level. As many as 30,000 however have incomes above 200% of
poverty.
→Back to Top
§
Contact
Us
Paul
Gionfriddo
Executive
Director
Indigent
Care Collaboration
1213
N. IH-35
Austin,
TX 78702
Phone:
(512) 927-2677
Fax:
(512) 927-1350
E-mail:
pgionfriddo@icc-centex.org
→Back to Top
|